For Sponsors & CROs

Know whether an AI-assisted workflow is ready for controlled use.

AI is entering clinical operations through vendor products, internal pilots, and workflow-level automation. The question is no longer only whether the AI output is useful. The question is whether your organization can govern how that output is used.

Corevident helps sponsors and CROs operationalize Decision Authority™ so teams know who can rely on an AI output, what must escalate, what evidence is needed, who approves the action, and how oversight continues after deployment.

Assess Your AI Workflow for Controlled Use Schedule a Readiness Conversation →
The Governance Gap

AI pilots often move faster than the operating model around them.

A workflow may already be producing useful outputs, but regulated teams still need to answer:

Who owns the decision?
What requires human review?
What must escalate?
What evidence is retained?
Who approves use?
How is oversight maintained?

When those answers are unclear, adoption slows, review cycles expand, and teams carry approval ambiguity into clinical operations.

Where This Applies

Start with one AI-assisted workflow.

Corevident can support AI use cases across regulated clinical work, including:

Protocol Review Support Site Readiness Scoring Clinical Query Drafting Safety Issue Triage Document Finding Review Regulatory Drafting Support Vendor-Enabled AI Workflows

The starting point does not need to be enterprise-wide. The right starting point is one workflow where AI is beginning to influence regulated work and decision authority is unclear.

How Corevident Works

Governance built into the deployment from the start.

Corevident works inside your team through its AI-native operating environment to operationalize your AI use case with governance built into the deployment from the start. We turn governance into the working process, not a parallel document.

The outcome is a vendor-agnostic operational dossier that carries decision authority, accountability, evidence, approval, and oversight into your systems, vendors, and clinical operations processes.

Used to deliver Corevident engagements, not sold as a standalone platform.

Governed Deployment Foundation

Your governed AI deployment foundation includes:

Decision Authority™ Map
Who can rely on, review, approve, or escalate AI-assisted work.
AI Governance Operating Model
How AI governance is organized at the enterprise level and owned inside the workflow.
Review & Escalation Rules
What needs human review, what escalates, and when.
Evidence Requirements
What should be retained in your system of record.
Approval Requirements
What must be confirmed before AI-assisted work moves forward.
Oversight Model
What to monitor, adjust, restrict, or pause after deployment.
When This Is Useful

Use this before AI moves from pilot to scale.

Corevident is useful when:

A vendor AI product is entering clinical operations
An internal AI pilot is moving toward broader use
Quality, Regulatory, or Clinical Operations needs clearer approval language
Teams disagree on who owns an AI-assisted decision
Evidence expectations are unclear
Oversight has not been designed into the workflow
What This Is Not

Corevident does not replace regulated review.

Corevident does not certify, validate, or approve AI systems for regulatory compliance.

Corevident does not replace Quality, Regulatory, validation, legal, clinical, vendor oversight, or technology review processes.

The work helps sponsors and CROs define how AI-assisted work should be governed, reviewed, approved, evidenced, and overseen before controlled use expands.

Move from promising AI to governed clinical use.

Bring one AI-assisted workflow, vendor product, or pilot. Corevident will help determine what decision authority, evidence, approval, and oversight are needed before regulated AI scales.